Features & Analysis

The price of humanitarian principle

Jonathan Spector, MD, has worked for MSF in Darfur, Sudan and in Angola.

Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)

For a long time, aid organizations have faced many ethical dilemmas about where it is better to draw the line when negotiating with armed forces when delivering aid to vulnerable communities.

Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) puts some of these dilemmas on the spot in its new book titled ‘Agir à tout prix? Négociations humanitaires : l’expérience de Médecins Sans Frontières’ (‘Acting at any price? Humanitarian negotiations revealed: The MSF experience’). MSF’s collection of essays was launched to mark the 40th anniversary for the medical aid agency.

Besides being an anniversary book, ‘Acting at any price?’ provides the most detailed and self-critical insight into the deals aid organizations have to negotiate so they would be able to continue their work. Negotiations are often with groups and regimes which abuse human rights.

The book highlights the debate on the practices of contemporary humanitarian actions and the goals of these actions. At the same time, ‘Acting at any price?’ discusses the political transactions and balances of power and interests that in the end allow humanitarian activities to move forward. However, these are often masked by the haughty rhetoric of ‘humanitarian principles’.

‘Acting at any price? Humanitarian negotiations revealed’ offers a rare portrait of some of the most difficult recent operations conducted by MSF in Somalia, Burma, Gaza and Sri Lanka, among others. The reader can have a very clear picture of how humanitarian aid organizations work and the price they have to pay  fulfill their aims.

Bribes, corruption, using combatants to ensure safety of the organization’s team and convoys are also part of the negotiations and compromises aid agencies are willing to do when the aim is to get the job done. These actions may have unintended consequences which lead us to the main question the book intends to ask: What is an acceptable compromise for MSF? And what is an acceptable compromise in humanitarian aid?

The book shows clearly that there are no criteria for determining the legitimacy of the humanitarian action and that even if aid actors claim they are above politics the reality shows the contrary.


8 replies »

  1. I just want to say I am just new to blogging and actually liked you’re web-site. Very likely I’m likely to bookmark your blog post . You surely have impressive article content. With thanks for sharing with us your web page.

  2. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.

  3. I think this is one of the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But want to remark on some general things, The web site style is ideal, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  4. Thanks for the sensible critique. Me & my neighbor were just preparing to do a little research on this. We got a grab a book from our area library but I think I learned more from this post. I’m very glad to see such fantastic information being shared freely out there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s